BLOG
COVID- 19 – What to think about chloroquine ? William Dab’s statement
- #compliance
- #Coronavirus
- #COVID-19
- #EHS
- #epidemic
- #health and safety
- #legal registration

Many wonder about the interest of chloroquine to cure Covid. Here is my statement. Medical and scientific ethics main principle…
Many wonder about the interest of chloroquine to cure Covid. Here is my statement. Medical and scientific ethics main principle is to submit results before claiming victory. Currently, the only efficient and proven weapon is the strict hygiene policies respect. To prematurely and publicly announce a medicinal solution, not pairs evaluated, is irresponsible and can lead to people backing off with restrictions. At the beginning of every epidemic, there is always a smart one with the solution. We’ve experienced that during the rise of aids epidemic. In vague circumstances, it’s normal to look for quick and easy solution. Scientists and doctors must not follow this path. Chloroquine lead is interesting and can possibly come to a therapeutics solution. Chinese scientists showed an in vitro virucide activity but insist on the need to test this molecule on people. Which is not done already. Moreover, if the medicine is efficient for human there will be other questions to consider before launching a mass treatment. Especially, to validate that chloroquine does not provoke a viral resistance. Yet, many monotherapies select quickly resistant virus. In the case of aids, I remember it needed 3 antivirals to control the disease. To conclude, unlike what the USA president told, FDA did not authorize chloroquine as a Covid treatment. Join our Red-on-line discussion group on LinkedIn to share with EHS managers, our legal team and William Dab: Covid-19 – HSE Red-on-line Experts Forum