BLOG
Two Interpretations of OSHA’s Recordkeeping Requirements
- #Health & Safety
- #Occupational Safety and Health
- #OSHA
- #safety

OSHA has released two interpretation letters on recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Recently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) posted two…
OSHA has released two interpretation letters on recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Recently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) posted two interpretation letters regarding its recordkeeping and reporting requirements. One clarifies whether or not an employer must report the loss of a fingertip, and the other clarifies when self-treatment may become medical treatment beyond first aid and require the employer to record an injury as a work-related injury. In the first letter, an employee lost the tip of his finger in a workplace event, and a physician classified the injury as an avulsion. OSHA does not classify avulsions as amputations that must be reported to OSHA. Employers should rely on a health care professional’s diagnosis. If a health care professional’s diagnosis is not available, OSHA instructs employers to refer to the definition and examples of amputation in 29 CFR 1904.39. Examples of avulsions that do not need to be reported are deglovings, scalpings, fingernail and toenail avulsions, eyelid avulsions, tooth avulsions, and severed ears.
Sources :
OSHA letter of interpretation, Recordkeeping Regulation contained in 29 CFR Part 1904[1904.39(b)(11)], dated May 25, 2016 OSHA letter of interpretation, Recordkeeping Regulation contained in 29 CFR Part 1904[1904.0007(b)(5)(ii)(F)], dated April 14, 2016 Was this article helpful? Here are some other articles you might like: OSHA Changes Policy on Covered Concentrations of Chemicals (US) OSHA Delays Enforcement of Anti-Retaliation Provisions (US)Our EHS experts are happy to answer any questions you have.
For more EHS news, subscribe to our newsletter.