• Careers
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact our team

BLOG

Procedures for Prioritization of Chemicals for Risk Evaluation under TSCA (US)

On January 17, 2017 the US EPA proposed procedures for prioritization of chemicals for risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) as required under the new section 6(b)(1) amendment in the “Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act” passed on June 22, 2016.  EPA is proposing to include four steps or phases in prioritization. These are as follows: (1) Pre-prioritization, (2) Initiation, (3) Proposed Designation, and (4) Final Designation.  As part of this process, and as required by the act, EPA will identify chemical substances as either High-Priority Substances for risk evaluation, or Low-Priority Substances for which risk evaluations are not warranted at the time.

The initiation phase will require EPA to announce a candidate substance and give the public a 90 day comment period to provide relevant information on the chemical. In the proposed designation step, EPA will be required to screen the chemical substances against multiple criteria specific in TSCA 6(b)(1)(A):  hazard and exposure potential of the chemical substance (e.g., persistence and bioaccumulation, potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, and storage near significant sources of drinking water), the conditions of use or significant changes in the conditions of use of the chemical substance, and the volume or significant changes in the volume of the chemical substance manufactured or processed.  Once this screening process is complete, EPA must publish the chemical’s proposed prioritization designation (High-Priority or Low—Priority) as well as any information or analyses used in that designation and again give the public a 90 day period to comment. During the Final Designation step, EPA will make its final designation as to whether the chemical is a High-Priority Substance requiring a risk evaluation.

Certain chemicals will be treated slightly different during the prioritization process. In particular, when prioritizing metals or metal compounds EPA must use the March 2007 Framework for Metals Risk Assessment of the Office of the Science Advisor. EPA is also to give preference to chemical substances that are listed in the 2014 Update of the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical Assessments that have persistence and bioaccumulation scores of 3 and are known human carcinogens and have high acute and chronic toxicity.

Comments in response to this proposal must be received on or before March 20, 2017, they can be submitted at http://www.regulations.gov referencing EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0636.

Sources :

US EPA Proposes Procedures for Prioritization of Chemicals for Risk Evaluation Under TSCA, 82 FR 4825 (2016). 

On the same subject